On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:10:35 -0400 Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:

:>The fact that the hardware guys and gals made the hardware capable of 
execution above the bar means IBM is giving this some thought. (The thought may 
be "Heck, no!" <g>)

Well, they never supported code execution from a dataspace ......

:>-----Original Message-----
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On 
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
:>Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 5:00 PM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: 64 bit execution above the bar

:>On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:19:31 -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
:>>What is IBM's strategy for migrating code execution to be above the bar? Has 
IBM released any documents detailing the next steps, or is this confidential?
 
:>It has been discussed here for a while.  You could disable interrupts, branch 
to code above the bar, and branch back later.  (I suppose the Old PSW was 
unconditionally scrunched.)  More recently, interrupts above the bar are 
tolerated, but no system services can be called from above the bar.

:>>Currently data areas above the bar are widely used but program execution 
above the bar is not currently supported. Other posts have suggested that Cobol 
will soon support 64 bit execution but not only for modules loaded  below the 
bar and that 64 bit Cobol is unlikely to be widely used as it is not compatible 
with 31 bit Cobol and has performance issues.

:>Performance issues have been mentioned here.  Are those because of:
:>o I-fetch bandwidth?
:>o Address calculation/translation overhead?
:>o Computation overhead?
:>o Some combination?

:>I'd guess that instructions with 64-bit operands are slower than instructions 
with shorter operands, even in AMODE 24/31.

:>Is AMODE 31 slower than AMODE 24?  (Or even the opposite?)

:>>Does anybody know if IBM plans to run system modules above the bar? I would 
be interested in hearing any comments/insights on this topic?

:>Not I.  How close is LPA to encountering a Virtual Address Storage Constraint?

--
Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to