I understand why you may have thought that but no I understand it is not the 
slip that spawns the records.  But couldn't it be said that the slip parms are 
indicating IBM's view of the severity of the event? I am so new to this that 
heck I may not be even asking the questions right.  For that I'm sorry.

For example.  Here is one symptom record in particular we are constantly seeing 
(there are others but let's use this as an example): 

PIDS/5695DF105 RIDS/IGG0CLA9 RIDS/IGG0CLX0#L PRCS/000000F6 PRCS/00000000 
     PRCS/00000000 JOBN/DBP1DBM1                            <==== the JOBN 
changes but they all seem to be DB2 related tasks.     All the other 
information is the same.
                                                                  
 SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT:                                              
     CPU MODEL:  2964               DATE:  166  17                
     CPU SERIAL: 0207C7             TIME:  01:06:27.72            
     SYSTEM:     MBI2               BCP:   MVS                    
     RELEASE LEVEL OF SERVICE ROUTINE:      HBB77A0               
     SYSTEM DATA AT ARCHITECTURE LEVEL:     10                    
     COMPONENT DATA AT ARCHITECTURE LEVEL:  10                    
     SYSTEM DATA:  00000000 00000000    |........|                
 COMPONENT INFORMATION:                                           
     COMPONENT ID:             5695DF105                          
     COMPONENT RELEASE LEVEL:  220                                
     SERVICE RELEASE LEVEL:    UA82137                            
     DESCRIPTION OF FUNCTION:  CATPROB DATA          

PRIMARY SYMPTOM STRING:                                           
    PIDS/5695DF105 RIDS/IGG0CLA9 RIDS/IGG0CLX0#L PRCS/000000F6    
    PRCS/00000000 JOBN/DBP3DBM1                                   
                                                                  
    SYMPTOM            SYMPTOM DATA     EXPLANATION               
    ---------------    -------------    -----------               
    PIDS/5695DF105     5695DF105        COMPONENT IDENTIFIER      
    RIDS/IGG0CLA9      IGG0CLA9         ROUTINE IDENTIFIER        
    RIDS/IGG0CLX0#L    IGG0CLX0#L       ROUTINE IDENTIFIER        
    PRCS/000000F6      000000F6         RETURN CODE               
    PRCS/00000000      00000000         RETURN CODE               
    JOBN/DBP3DBM1      DBP3DBM1         JOB NAME                  
                                                                  
THE SYMPTOM RECORD DOES NOT CONTAIN A SECONDARY SYMPTOM STRING.   
FREE FORMAT COMPONENT INFORMATION:                                             

And then there appears to be a snap dump of storage on each one.

Nothing on IBMLINK matching anything that I can think to search on from the 
fields.  In the syslog we see IBM slip trap x91A taken about the time of each 
record.  
2017166 01:06:27.72          00000284  IEA989I SLIP TRAP ID=X91A MATCHED.  
JOBNAME=CATALOG , ASID=0086.

And there are sometimes 100s of this particular symptom records on a given 
lpar, per day.
Slip settings are:
ID=X91A,NONPER,ENABLED                                   
ACTION=NODUMP,SET BY CONS INTERNAL,RBLEVEL=ERROR,COMP=91A

91A                                                                          
                                                                             
 Explanation:  A request to abnormally end the catalog address space (CAS)   
 service task was issued either through the MODIFY CATALOG,RESTART command,  
 or through catalog analysis task processing.                                
                                                                             
 System Action:  The system re-drives the catalog request currently in       
 process.                                                                    

We are not issuing a MODIFY CATALOG RESTART command at the time of any of the 
logrecs being cut.  SO might there something wrong with the catalog process 
that all these redrives are necessary?  Is it normal behavior?  So many 
questions and I'm clueless, unfortunately.

So what I guess I was trying to wrap my head around is:  if there isn't a need 
to take a dump, etc. (as specified in the SLIP setting) then why have logic to 
cut 100's of symptom records at all for that particular issue?  And if we're 
cutting 100's of records - is it really a problem? And like Ed said, it's 
noise, and I don't know enough to know it's a problem or not and sometimes how 
to go about diagnosing.  So I was hoping to get some help (which I have) in how 
to handle these and others going forward.  

Thanks for your and others responses, though. It's much appreciated and I'm 
taking it all in as much as I can.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf 
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 4:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: AW: Re: EREP Symptom and/or Software Records

>But I still can't get my head around, why cut 100's of symptom/software 
>records a day at all for a particular problem, if we're just going to ignore 
>them - abend or not. But I'll try to let that not keep me awake at night.



I may well be wrong with my interpretation of the above statement and a similar 
one in you initial post. Anyway, here I go...


I seem to understand that you got the impression that it is all those SLIPs 
that are responsible for the logrec entries, that is, the logrec records are 
written because of a SLIP. This is not the case. A problem arises in the 
software, and this may lead to an ABEND (SVC 13) being issued either by the 
software explicitly, or by some service routine that was called. Logrec records 
are a consequence of this. 


SLIPs are set to perform an action when events, such as ABENDs, and a lot more, 
occur. The logrec records are written independently.


--
Peter Hunkeler



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to