Just because I managed to survive without change control doesn't mean that I have no scars.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of Bobbie Justice <00000013e2d84072-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 11:14 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: Parmlib members change control? Good lord no. I'm reminded that somehow ("magically I guess"), we all managed to survive the 60s, 70s, 80s, and even the early 90s without this formal change control nonsense. If you must track, then the product from action software works. Otherwise no, just no, easy solution below. current parm/proclib member - current name backout parm/proclib member - with a $ suffix at the end (if you want one more backlevel, then use a # as the suffix) Implementation and backout plans work wonders and have been way before formal change management was ever devised. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
