Thank you one and all for your excellent advice. בתאריך יום ב׳, 26 בנוב׳ 2018, 21:36, מאת Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu>:
> The only documented way that I know of is with WTO; why the FM specifies > ROUTCDE=14 rather than 11 I don't understand. There's an undocumented ACB > interface. but I don't recall the setup details. > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf > of Jesse 1 Robinson <jesse1.robin...@sce.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 3:17 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > Our SMF exits still use IEFYS to write messages to the job output stream. > If there were some other 'more modern' method, I'd use it, but I know of > none. As for doc, I've never found any. I just call the interface--which at > least seems to be a supported if somewhat clandestine UI--and it continues > to work through decades of OS upgrades. We absolutely need to write > messages from SMF exits. If not IEFYS, then how? I'm open to improvements. > > . > . > J.O.Skip Robinson > Southern California Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 323-715-0595 Mobile > 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW > robin...@sce.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Seymour J Metz > Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 11:49 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: (External):Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > 1. IEFYS is a really old interface; I didn't think anybody was still > using it. The best place to look is probably the OS/360 documentation at > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1gnfRXs1KF_kQF-919fF6eZq16WYo4NjFG740q0HSIRf0e9hVyYm15nERpwmkSe9X4fUeZoKpEARI5iYlW8dBl3bhnlO7EiAfnMus7A7SPR9NMKQHFGwWU-G0uq78_vsmn4nB7dkqrtT5l_vwTQIm2L_K3jzxXHxQgmUE11hH5U8bQcV7Veylge_htj1Vdg4_8aDfe6tyRADVG2d8GFRYeen8ZACtgoTzdX0f8GMdgLTd37-jNBBHdaztHyYeEXt0d7e0PUEE3-Pc0QG0eLRKcMTXO2FXtzQCLl6SYrwNTBUese1rAqBXfr9AFTAUvuZ4zaruqj_ypr5tLg21PeWWDuDDKL496PQNaBelfn34ndBmfNJBmT2rIac1YuttyCG8ffJTQZ7l4KE3aMXs5MPezu5VMNb_Qu6v40jGFwHohkFPcjmA15EjM1OIaCXVwAZR/http%3A%2F%2Fbitsavers.org%2Fpdf%2Fibm%2F360%2Fos%2FR20.1_Mar71%2FGC28-6550-9_OS_System_Programmers_Guide_Rel_20.1_Jun71.pdf > > 2. Doesn't IEFACTRT run under the Initiator TCB? I would expect the > storage of the terminating job step to be long gone. > > 3. Show your parameter list and return code. You're running under the > Initiator, so it may be an issue with your security environment. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf > of Steff Gladstone <steff.gladst...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 3:53 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > Three questions regarding IEFACTRT: > > 1. Where is use of IEFYS for writing messages to the JOBLOG documented? > The example given in the documentation for IEFACTRT is incomplete. Google > doesn't seem to locate the doc as well. > > 2. I am abending on S0C4 because getmained areas are automatically being > freed at end of step, before IEFACTRT gets control. It is not clear to me > if SUBPOOL alone can solve the problem. Do I need to specify > TCBADDR=TCBJSTCB on the STORAGE macro so that the "input TCB" is the > job-step TCB? What course is recommended? > > 3. The documentation says one can dynamically allocate within IEFACTRT but > the BPXWDYN routine returns a non-zero return code. (Same code that works > fine in a regular program.) Is this a limitation of BPXWDYN? Should I code > an SVC 99 call myself? > > Thank you in advance, > Steff Gladstone > > > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 16:17, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > > > I use the CSVDYNEX interface extensively and it has been nothing but > > bulletproof in all of my experience. Kudos! > > > > Charles > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] > > On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht > > Sent: Friday, October 5, 2018 6:20 AM > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > > Subject: Re: Looking for an appropriate system exit > > > > Peter Relson wrote: > > > > >When the facility was developed, we took a stab at which existing > > >exits > > that we thought were most likely to be of help to the most customers. > > And I'd hope that new exits use it. > > > > That was one of the best stabs I got from Big Blue. It saved me an > > unneeded IPL when one of my SMF exits went down the bit bucket. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
