>IGG01557W That's hardly a smoking gun, unless I am misunderstanding. Unless your smoking gun is having utility messages within "system messages" and you think that IBM will think it's worth the $$ to put them somewhere else (let alone deal with a case about it). Maybe the rule is that "system utilities" messages are included within "system messages". If so, I was obviously wrong about my expectations.
This is a message from a utility. The rules that it uses, that you showed, match what I had said. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
