At least in 5.1 and above, wouldn't the proper response, after waiting a bit, 
be to do a "FORCE VMEABCD IMMED", rather than a full system IPL? 


-- 
Robert P. Nix           Mayo Foundation
RO-OC-1-13              200 First Street SW
507-284-0844            Rochester, MN 55905
-----
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
 in practice, theory and practice are different."

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich 
Smrcina
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 2:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: I'll never understand

Isn't this typically related to a hung I/O nowadays?

On Friday 02 June 2006 2:01 pm, Huegel, Thomas wrote:
> After 40 years of developement and millions of lines of code why this will
> still cause a VM IPL.
>
> HCPCQU361E LOGOFF/FORCE pending for user VSEABCD

Reply via email to