I am on 5.2 and if the IMMED worked I would be pleased as punch, but low and behold it just tells me this..
force vseabcd immed
HCPUSO361E LOGOFF/FORCE pending for user VSEABCD
over and over and over again.
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]On
Behalf Of Nix, Robert P.
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 2:59 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: I'll never understand
At least in 5.1 and above, wouldn't the proper response, after waiting a bit, be to do a "FORCE VMEABCD IMMED", rather than a full system IPL?
--
Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
RO-OC-1-13 200 First Street SW
507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905
-----
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
in practice, theory and practice are different."
-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 2:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: I'll never understand
Isn't this typically related to a hung I/O nowadays?
On Friday 02 June 2006 2:01 pm, Huegel, Thomas wrote:
> After 40 years of developement and millions of lines of code why this will
> still cause a VM IPL.
>
> HCPCQU361E LOGOFF/FORCE pending for user VSEABCD
__________________________________________________________________
<< ella for Spam Control >> has removed VSE-List messages and set aside VM-List for me
You can use it too - and it's FREE! http://www.ellaforspam.com
