On Wednesday, 06/07/2006 at 05:46 AST, Rich Greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any possibility that VTAM, being a bit long in the tooth, was > set up before SFS was as reliable as it presently is? Perhaps a few > added sections in the PPF file(s) . . . . . ?
Oh, and I should follow-up that the lack of customer demand was likely due to lack of entrenched and widespread customer use of SFS at the time. VTAM 4.2 came out in 1995. SFS was only 7 years old. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
