I stand corrected. It was 1995, not 1992, and it hasn't been enhanced since. Maybe it was a lack of demand in VTAM rather than in SFS. (If only our z/OS folks would hurry up and get 1.7 in so that we could do away with VTAM on VM. We need the TCPNJE support.)
Regards, Richard Schuh -----Original Message----- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 3:36 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: VTAM and SFS Installation On Wednesday, 06/07/2006 at 05:46 AST, Rich Greenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any possibility that VTAM, being a bit long in the tooth, was > set up before SFS was as reliable as it presently is? Perhaps a few > added sections in the PPF file(s) . . . . . ? Oh, and I should follow-up that the lack of customer demand was likely due to lack of entrenched and widespread customer use of SFS at the time. VTAM 4.2 came out in 1995. SFS was only 7 years old. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
