The default is CP, there is no longer an ALL:

                                  .-CP-.  .-IPL---.                             
  
 >>--Set--DUMP--.-.-DASD-------.--'----'--+-------+--.----.-.---------------->< 
 >>  
                | | <--------< |          '-NOIPL-'  '-XF-' |                   
  
                | '----rdev----'                            |                   
  
                '-OFF---------------------------------------'                   
  



Regards,
Richard Schuh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 12:05 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> 
> 
> It appears IBM changed the SET DUMP command by removing the 
> ALL option.
> 
> SET DUMP aeb9 ALL IPL
> HCPDMR003E Invalid option - ALL
> 
> Must now be:
> 
> SET DUMP aeb9 cp  IPL
> DASD AEB9 dump unit CP IPL pages 52052
> 
> Why did IBM remove the ALL option in 5.2?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of David Boyes
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:50 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> 
> 
> Most obvious reason is that 5.2 now dumps more than 2G. 4.4 
> only dumped
> the 1st 2G regardless of how much real storage was there. 
> 
> David Boyes
> Sine Nomine Associates
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On
> > Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:31 PM
> > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> > Subject: z/VM 5.2 Dumps
> > 
> > IIRC, there was a discussion, either at SHARE or in this forum,  in
> which
> > it was stated that dumps of z/VM 5.2 would not be 
> significantly larger
> 
> > than those from what were then the current systems (mine was 4.4).
> Would
> > somebody like to recant? Our dumps are much, much larger. 
> When I used 
> > VMARC to compress a 5.2 dump, it is reduced to approximately 18% of
> its
> > former size. That compressed dump is larger than the uncompressed
> dumps I
> > used to get from 4.4. Same h/w, same everything except for VM CP.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Richard Schuh
> > 
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please 
> notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, 
> print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here 
> for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.     
http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to