On Wednesday, 08/09/2006 at 10:34 AST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clearly at some point in the past, there was a need for a clean shutdown > and cleanup of what you're doing; otherwise the #CP EXT code wouldn't be > there. Modifying it to catch the architected signal and do the same > thing instead of faking it with a SHUTTRAP-based kludge is the Right > Thing to Do.
In the dim Mists of Tyme, maybe. The Pascal socket interface actually sends a "shuttingdown" signal to the clients. NETSTAT CP EXT is ok for that. But who wants to write Pascal code? There's no provision for it in BSD sockets. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
