Brian Nielsen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:37:07 -0400, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Then we wouldn't need CMSDDR any more.
I don't see how that removes the need for CMS DDR. If anything it seems
to strengthen it because standalone DDR wouldn't have access to whatever
is doing the tape handling. I don't think you meant we wouldn't need
standalone DDR because that will always be needed as a last resort for
when CMS is not available, and therefore it has to be able to read what
CMS DDR wrote. This requires the media handling function to be part of
standalone DDR, which seems contrary to your comment. Please clarify in
case I misunderstood you.
Brian Nielsen
Brian, I believe that David was referring to the CMSDDR package on the
VM Downlad page, not the CMS DDR module.
