IIRC, Alan (or was it Chuckie<g>) mentioned quite a while ago that more 
and more IBM VM products were going to start using SFS as their default 
install disks.  I am neither pro nor con with regards to using SFS. 
Everything has it's place.  We use SFS quite a bit so I don't have to many 
problems with it.  It has made my life easier from a management point of 
view.  Users always want more disk space.  I'm busy enough as it is 
without having to stop what I'm doing, to enlarge a minidisk.  But being 
an old VM'er, I'd still prefer products to be installed on mdisks.  IMO, 
SFS adds an extra layer of complexity when doing Disaster Recovery 
testing.
Steve G.

Reply via email to