We still have many cd commands to issue. One mput per is a good idea, assuming that there are no errors that abort the transfers. One put per member facilitates restart. Besides, the HELP for MPUT says that pattern matching only works for a foreignhost that is z/VM. In my case, it will be z/OS..
Regards, Richard Schuh ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:07 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: FTP Why not turn prompt off and do a MPUT * ________________________________ Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering KP-IT Enterprise Engineering 925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck Kaiser Service Credo: "Our cause is health. Our passion is service. We're here to make lives better." I never guess. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. From: "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: 12/05/2007 11:00 AM Subject: FTP ________________________________ We have a one-time need to FTP thousands of files to an MVS system from VM. Is there any way to coax FTP to read a file for its subcommands? I see nothing in the syntax that performs the same function as the Windows switch -s:fileid. Is it really necessary to stack all of the subcommands before issuing the FTP command? Regards, Richard Schuh
