On Wednesday, 11/11/2009 at 05:54 EST, "Schuh, Richard" <rsc...@visa.com> 
wrote:
> Might not work - FOR is a legitimate abbreviation of the CP  FOrward 
command.

Not any more it isn't.  When FOR was introduced, the minimum abbreviation 
for FORWARD had to change to 'FORW'.  (This is an example of why Good 
Programmers don't use command abbreviations in their programs.)

If an ESM is present, you need not be the secuser or have class C in order 
to use FOR.  CP issues a RACROUTE call to the ESM, asking if you have READ 
authority to the LOGONBY.targetuser profile in the SURROGAT class.   If 
so, you can issue the FOR command.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to