Hi Barbara,

I can't comment on the IBM products, since I have no exposure to them.
We have used the CA products, and are very happy with them.

What you use for backup depends on how you use the system. Do you have
lots of CMS users, or do you just use CMS for VM and Linux
administration? With lots of CMS users, you will need a file level
backup program, such as VM:Backup. If you use CMS only for
administration, then you can probably get by with volume level backups
using something like DDR, which comes with VM, or VM:Backup Hidro.
Remember that ANY full volume backups on Linux disks MUST be done with
Linux down, otherwise you will not get usable backups.

Do you do frequent backups? If yes, you definitely want a tape manager.
If your backups are infrequent, then you could make do with manual tape
management, although I would not recommend it (unless you are using
something like 3592 tapes, you will have multiple backup tape volumes,
and it is SO easy to mount the wrong one). Note that to use multiple
tape volumes for a disk volume backup with DDR and a tape manager, you
need to do a small mod to DDR so that it will call the tape manager to
mount the next scratch tape.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Barbara Andrews
Sent: December 16, 2009 13:53
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Recommendation on Backup product for z/VM

We are looking for a replacement to our current backup methods and are 
looking for recommendations.  We are currently running several Linux 
virtual machines on two VM LPARs and have been backing these up, as well

as our VM system volumes, via our z/OS system using ADRDSSU. We also use

TSM to give us database file level restores for data within our linux 
systems. However, things are changing and we need to find a replacement 
method for the ADRDSSU backups.  Our z/OS system is very outdated (V1.3)

and is slated to be decommissioned soon. We are considering purchasing 
either IBM's Backup and Restore Manager for z/VM, or CA's VM:Backup to 
server our immediate needs.  And in the future perhaps other VM
Management 
products offered by IBM (Operations Manager, Tape Manager) or CA
(VM:Tape, 
VM:Schedule, VM:Operator, etc.).  Has anyone evaluated these products, 
especially for backup, and have a recommendation on which is better to 
use?  Are there any other options we should be considering?  TIA.


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.  Any 
review retransmission dissemination or other use of or taking any action in 
reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient or delegate is strictly prohibited.  If you received this in error 
please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  The 
integrity and security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.  
The sender accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail or for the 
consequences of any actions taken on the basis of information provided.  The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses.  The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this e-mail.  This disclaimer is property of the TTC and must 
not be altered or circumvented in any manner.

Reply via email to