I got that from a different IBM manual. The so called  national characters have 
been a part of the alphanumeric set since S/360 days. They were included as an 
extension of the alphabet. 

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r4/index.jsp?topic=/rzatb/vdefn.htm
IBM standard volume label (VOL1)
" The alphanumeric character set includes A-Z, 0-9, @, $, and #. "

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 5:53 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Automated DDR funny - has anyone got any ideas
> 
> On Friday, 03/12/2010 at 05:42 EST, "Schuh, Richard" <rsc...@visa.com>
> wrote:
> > It must be Friday, Alan answered hastily like he was 
> anxious to leave
> the 
> > office. It is A-Z, 0-9, @,#,$
> 
> Alan did not answer hastily.  From IBM Corporate Standard C-S 
> 3-8010-003, 1998, "Volume Labels for Storage Devices":
> 
> "This field may
> contain from one to six alphabetic and/or numeric characters. 
> If the volume identifier is less than six characters, it is 
> left-justified and the remainder is padded with spaces. On 
> both input and output, the system must check this field 
> against the value supplied by the user. The content is 
> permanently assigned by the installation to identify this 
> volume, and is entered at label creation.
> Note: Some existing systems accept a wider character set than 
> is permitted here, if the characters are specified within 
> enclosing apostrophes. Some programs to which this standard 
> is applicable must maintain compatibility with these systems 
> and are therefore permitted this specific additional latitude."
> 
> The standard defines "alphabetic" as A-Z (actually, A, B, C, 
> D, etc. to avoid confusion) and "numeric" as 0-9.
> 
> So, our existing labeling programs that allow blanks in the 
> middle of labels (very annoying) and characters that aren't 
> the same in all code pages (@ is one) are permitted under the 
> grandfather clause, but they aren't compliant.
> 
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IBM Endicott
> 

Reply via email to