Great! It seems works! Thank you, Marcy! Best Regards Anson Y
________________________________ 发件人： Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 收件人： IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 发送日期： 2010/4/13 (周二) 2:52:16 下午 主 题： Re: 回复： RE： LINUX on IFL switch the 2 command lines. Marcy ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Anson Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 11:37 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] 回复： RE： LINUX on IFL After added below two statement, I still got error message. ========================================== MACH ESA 1 COMMAND DEFINE CPU 0 TYPE IFL COMMAND SET VCONFIG MODE LINUX ========================================== HCPCPU1462E An attempt was made to define CPU(s) that would create a virtual CPU configuration that is not valid. MODE = LINUX Best Regards Anson Y ________________________________ 发件人： Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 收件人： IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 发送日期： 2010/4/13 (周二) 12:43:19 下午 主 题： Re: RE： LINUX on IFL oh wait, add this too COMMAND SET VCONFIG MODE LINUX Marcy ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Anson Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 9:37 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] RE： LINUX on IFL Marcy, I understand. Thank you! But I encountered a trouble after add COMMAND DEFINE CPU statement in the direct file. Below is the part of direct file for this linux: MACH ESA 1 CPU 06 COMMAND DEFINE CPU 06 IFL After I log on to this guest machine, I got below message: HCPCAM002E Invalid operand - IFL Am I wrong? And how to dedicate the whole IFL to that virtual server as you mentioned? Best Regards Anson Y ________________________________ 发件人： Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 收件人： IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 发送日期： 2010/4/13 (周二) 12:25:36 下午 主 题： Re: LINUX on IFL That is the official way to do it (to define a virtual server to run on the IFL(s)). It's just not clear from the doc that you use the COMMAND + the DEFINE instead of some format of the CPU statement as one would expect. The other option as mentioned here is to dedicate the whole IFL to that virtual server. That might also suit your purposes (but then you won't ever be able to run something else on that one too). Marcy ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Anson Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 9:02 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] LINUX on IFL Marcy, thanks! Do you mean it's not very clear from IBM doc on how to define the corresponding part in the directory entry and you submitted a reader's comments to IBM? The command you mentioned below is a workaround, right? COMMAND DEFINE CPU XX TYPE IFL. sorry, English is not my first language... Best Regards Anson Y ________________________________ 发件人： Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 收件人： IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 发送日期： 2010/4/13 (周二) 11:43:23 上午 主 题： Re: 回复： LINUX on IFL COMMAND DEFINE CPU XX TYPE IFL. In the directory entry Its not very clear from the IBM doc. I submitted a reader's comment and it was accepted. Marcy ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Sent: Mon Apr 12 22:20:57 2010 Subject: [IBMVM] 回复： LINUX on IFL Marcy, Thanks! How to do in user direct file if I want to permanent let this IFL dedicated to that zLinux? I used q cpu to know the CPU id of IFL. e.g. 03 is IFL. I defined CPU 03 in the linux user direct file. But it seems doesn't work. What else did I miss? Best Regards Anson Y ________________________________ 发件人： Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 收件人： IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 发送日期： 2010/4/13 (周二) 11:14:28 上午 主 题： Re: LINUX on IFL Everything will use the cps unless they have issued the DEFINE CPU command. So the answer is yes. Marcy ________________________________ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Sent: Mon Apr 12 21:36:17 2010 Subject: [IBMVM] LINUX on IFL Hi All, I have question about Linux on IFL. If there is a zVM LPAR with both CPs and 1 IFL. Is it possible to let one Linux guest to excluded use this IFL and only use this IFL? (We assume this IFL is dedicated on this LPAR) Thanks! Best Regards Anson Y
