>>> On 8/4/2010 at 02:18 PM, "Schuh, Richard" <rsc...@visa.com> wrote: > I noticed this morning that there seems to be a major discrepancy between the > number of blocks allocated in the responses to Q VDISK and Q VDISK SYSLIM. > The total of the number of blocks in the former is about 30% of the number > being reported as in use in the latter. What gives? Is the number reported > for he individual users in Q VDISK the number actually in use and the number > in Q VDISK SYSLIM the total of the limits for all users?
Yes, with the caveat that while the sum of all USERLIM can exceed the single SYSLIM value, actual usage may not. Mark Post
