On Friday, 04/01/2011 at 04:28 EDT, Mark Wheeler <mwheele...@hotmail.com> 
wrote:

> Wouldn't you rather say:
> <snip>
> - If you have a CEC with one or more z/VM LPARs that are defined to 
use GPs, 
> count all GPs on the CEC
> - If you have a CEC with one or more z/VM LPARs that are defined to 
use IFLs, 
> count all IFLs on the CEC
> <snip>
>  

"If you have one or more" vs. "If you have a" .    Hmmm....  Let us say 
you have two pieces of candy in your pocket and I ask, "Do you have a 
piece of candy in your pocket?"  I think you'd be obliged to say "Yes." 

But I'm an easy-going kind of guy and I'll say it any way you want as long 
as the numbers add up! And in the interests of creating confusion, I don't 
mean "z/VM *mode* LPAR", but "an LPAR [one or more LPARs] running z/VM".

Alan Altmark

z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
IBM System Lab Services and Training 
ibm.com/systems/services/labservices 
office: 607.429.3323
mobile; 607.321.7556
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to