If this was any more confusing it would have to be the IRS..... On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> On Friday, 04/01/2011 at 04:28 EDT, Mark Wheeler <mwheele...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > Wouldn't you rather say: > > <snip> > > - If you have a CEC with one or more z/VM LPARs that are defined to > use GPs, > > count all GPs on the CEC > > - If you have a CEC with one or more z/VM LPARs that are defined to > use IFLs, > > count all IFLs on the CEC > > <snip> > > > > "If you have one or more" vs. "If you have a" . Hmmm.... Let us say > you have two pieces of candy in your pocket and I ask, "Do you have a > piece of candy in your pocket?" I think you'd be obliged to say "Yes." > > But I'm an easy-going kind of guy and I'll say it any way you want as long > as the numbers add up! And in the interests of creating confusion, I don't > mean "z/VM *mode* LPAR", but "an LPAR [one or more LPARs] running z/VM". > > Alan Altmark > > z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant > IBM System Lab Services and Training > ibm.com/systems/services/labservices > office: 607.429.3323 > mobile; 607.321.7556 > alan_altm...@us.ibm.com > IBM Endicott >
