On 8/1/2023 8:56 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
The eventual product should point back to the problem statement for the background information.
That is certainly a valid approach. However I suggest it's less efficient for this topic and possibly will lose some casual readers of the spec, by virtue of the indirection. (Extra clicks cost usability.)
I suggest, instead, whatever spec is produced have a statement of the problem. This is a relatively simple problem to explain. No doubt the text will be drawn from this draft.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim