Problem Statements may be published but are more importantly considered working documents with consensus from the working group.
We should get more "what didn't work" - people should send text ! tim On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 12:01 PM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net> wrote: > On 8/1/2023 8:56 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: > > The eventual product should point back to the problem statement for > > the background information. > > That is certainly a valid approach. However I suggest it's less > efficient for this topic and possibly will lose some casual readers of > the spec, by virtue of the indirection. (Extra clicks cost usability.) > > I suggest, instead, whatever spec is produced have a statement of the > problem. This is a relatively simple problem to explain. No doubt the > text will be drawn from this draft. > > d/ > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list > Ietf-dkim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim >
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
