On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <m...@cloudmark.com> wrote:
> That's also something we considered when talking to the Mailman people. But > again, this is really a small percentage of what causes author signatures on > list mail to break. > >> Anyway, the list should be signing messages after adding subject line >> prefixes, and after adding body footers. It's the list's signature, and >> the list's reputation that need to be assessed by the recipient. There >> are many other modifications that a list might make (like stripping >> attachments, body prefixes, and so on) that would make l= useless. > > I think the MLM document makes all of this stuff pretty clear already. It does to me; it seems like dropping the original signature and signing with the list manager site signature is the appropriate way to go. I don't think I'd want to know that there is a use case where my DKIM signature still passes after somebody modified headers. Good intent aside, I see it being used for bad purposes too easily. If you're worried about DKIM signing spam sent to the list address, then that's a bit of a different problem, and it has a different, non-DKIM-related solution. Cheers, Al Iverson _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
