> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim- > boun...@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Al Iverson > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 11:52 AM > To: <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org> > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] If DKIM would ignore [] at the beginning of > the subject line > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy > <m...@cloudmark.com> wrote: > > > That's also something we considered when talking to the Mailman > people. But again, this is really a small percentage of what causes > author signatures on list mail to break. > > > >> Anyway, the list should be signing messages after adding subject > line > >> prefixes, and after adding body footers. It's the list's signature, > and > >> the list's reputation that need to be assessed by the recipient. > There > >> are many other modifications that a list might make (like stripping > >> attachments, body prefixes, and so on) that would make l= useless. > > > > I think the MLM document makes all of this stuff pretty clear > already. > > It does to me; it seems like dropping the original signature and > signing with the list manager site signature is the appropriate way to > go. I don't think I'd want to know that there is a use case where my > DKIM signature still passes after somebody modified headers. Good > intent aside, I see it being used for bad purposes too easily. > > If you're worried about DKIM signing spam sent to the list address, > then that's a bit of a different problem, and it has a different, > non-DKIM-related solution. > > Cheers, > Al Iverson >
+1 _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html