SM wrote: > Hi Hector, > At 15:20 14-05-2011, Hector Santos wrote: >> Shouldn't the MLM I-D say something regarding C14N and CR/LF related >> mutations? > > No.
Can't share the wisdom why? >> I hate kludges but the insight for interested DKIM verifiers may help >> increase valid signatures coming from Aliasing list streams with >> slight CR/LR mutations. > > I doubt that the example you are referring to is an "Aliasing" list stream. Just going by what the MLM I-D used for a "no change" MLM classification, i.e. a basic address expander. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
