> -----Original Message----- > From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsan...@isdg.net] > Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 9:25 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] MLM and C14N > > > This is a software problem, > > You mean the MLM who is ignorant of DKIM meta data for the past "40 > years?"
Yes, that's what I mean. > > not something that needs to be solved by creating a protocol > extension. > > Isn't that what you are doing in this MLM I-D, creating a DKIM > "protocol extension" for MLMs? No, that's not what that document does. Creating a new canonicalization is a protocol extension. It creates a slippery slope wherein we are constantly creating or adjusting canonicalization algorithm(s) to deal with new cases we find and want to accommodate. It's a bad idea. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
