Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> Isn't that what you are doing in this MLM I-D, creating a DKIM >> "protocol extension" for MLMs? > > No, that's not what that document does.
At the end of the day, this document is describing incompatibility issues and provide "suggestions" (remember it is suggestions not a mandate) in how (via protocol methods changes, administrative protocol setups, etc) with an idealized goal to minimize the impact of the incompatibility issues. If that is not what it does, what does it do for its potential audience of? - DKIM signer developer - MLM developer, - DKIM verifier developer What does one get out of this document? -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html