On 16/May/11 15:41, John R. Levine wrote: >> http://www.opendkim.org/stats/report.html#hdr_canon says >> >> Header canonicalization use: >> canonicalization count domains passed >> simple 653688 6786 591938 >> relaxed 3940377 56621 3640854 >> >> Although they only differ by 2% (90% simple vs 92% relaxed), such >> percentages would be superb for tools like Spamassassin. I'd expect >> at least 99% from a cryptographic tool. > > This tells me that the benefit from relaxed is at most pretty small.
OTOH, comparing the "count" fields of those two lines, 86% relaxed vs 14% simple, says that such kind of benefit is really really wanted. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
