Messages by Date
-
2008/04/03
Re: current usage of AAAA implicit MX?
Mark Andrews
-
2008/04/03
current usage of AAAA implicit MX?
Tony Hansen
-
2008/04/03
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Hector Santos
-
2008/04/03
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Bill McQuillan
-
2008/04/03
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Michael Storz
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Robert A. Rosenberg
-
2008/04/02
Re: History of fallback to A
Keith Moore
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Lisa Dusseault
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
SM
-
2008/04/02
Re: History of fallback to A
John C Klensin
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
John C Klensin
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
John C Klensin
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Lisa Dusseault
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: History of fallback to A
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/02
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Keith Moore
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Michael Storz
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Keith Moore
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Keith Moore
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Michael Storz
-
2008/04/02
Re: Registration model, 2821bis-06
Derek J. Balling
-
2008/04/02
Registration model, 2821bis-06
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: Scope Creep
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/02
Re: History of fallback to A
Alessandro Vesely
-
2008/04/01
outdated thinking about domains and hosts
Keith Moore
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Robert A. Rosenberg
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Robert A. Rosenberg
-
2008/04/01
Re: Scope Creep
John Leslie
-
2008/04/01
Re: Scope Creep
Alex van den Bogaerdt
-
2008/04/01
Re: nullmx
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/04/01
Re: Scope Creep
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/01
Re: Scope Creep
John Leslie
-
2008/04/01
Re: nullmx
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/04/01
Re: Scope Creep
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/01
Scope Creep
John Leslie
-
2008/04/01
Re: dual-stack IP transition
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Dave Crocker
-
2008/04/01
dual-stack IP transition
John Leslie
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Paul Smith
-
2008/04/01
The Actual Difference
John Leslie
-
2008/04/01
Re: nullmx
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/04/01
Re: nullmx
Hector Santos
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Keith Moore
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Sabahattin Gucukoglu
-
2008/04/01
Re: nullmx
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/04/01
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/04/01
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Robert A. Rosenberg
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/31
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/31
Re: dual-stack IP transition is not specific to SMTP
Keith Moore
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
John C Klensin
-
2008/03/31
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Keith Moore
-
2008/03/31
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/31
Re: nullmx
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/31
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/31
Re: nullmx
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Alex van den Bogaerdt
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
John R Levine
-
2008/03/31
Re: nullmx
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/31
dual-stack IP transition is not specific to SMTP
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
John Levine
-
2008/03/31
Re: nullmx (was: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis)
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
Willie Gillespie
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Sabahattin Gucukoglu
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
SM
-
2008/03/31
Looking for good mail vs. looking for bad mail
John Levine
-
2008/03/31
Re: Defaulting to no mail for IPv6-only hosts
SM
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Hector Santos
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/31
nullmx (was: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis)
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Alex van den Bogaerdt
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
Paul Smith
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/31
Defaulting to no mail for IPv6-only hosts
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/31
Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
SM
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Russ Allbery
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Carl S. Gutekunst
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
Jim Fenton
-
2008/03/30
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/30
Paradigm change?
John Leslie
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
John Leslie
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Hector Santos
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
John C Klensin
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
John Leslie
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
John C Klensin
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Carl S. Gutekunst
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
John C Klensin
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
John R Levine
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change
John R Levine
-
2008/03/30
Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/30
Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/30
Re: History of fallback to A
John Levine
-
2008/03/30
Re: History of fallback to A
Russ Allbery
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
John R Levine
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/30
Re: History of fallback to A
Alex van den Bogaerdt
-
2008/03/30
Re: History of fallback to A
Russ Allbery
-
2008/03/30
Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A
John R Levine
-
2008/03/30
Re: History of fallback to A
Alex van den Bogaerdt
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
John Levine
-
2008/03/30
Re: History of fallback to A
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/30
Re: Defaulting to no mail
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/29
History of fallback to A
John Levine
-
2008/03/29
Defaulting to no mail
John Levine
-
2008/03/28
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs (on CNAME again)
Mark Martinec
-
2008/03/28
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/28
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/28
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/27
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/27
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/27
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/27
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
Tony Finch
-
2008/03/27
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
John C Klensin
-
2008/03/27
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
SM
-
2008/03/27
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
SM
-
2008/03/27
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Tony Finch
-
2008/03/27
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/27
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Sabahattin Gucukoglu
-
2008/03/27
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
Matti Aarnio
-
2008/03/26
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/26
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Hector Santos
-
2008/03/26
Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/26
How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email
John Leslie
-
2008/03/26
Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Mark Andrews
-
2008/03/26
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
SM
-
2008/03/26
resolving the last few items for 2821bis
Tony Hansen
-
2008/03/26
Re: Implicit MX and A RRs
Tony Hansen
-
2008/03/21
Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-09
Tony Hansen
-
2008/03/21
Re: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-09
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/20
draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-09
John C Klensin
-
2008/03/14
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/13
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/12
Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations
Tony Finch
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/11
RE: email-arch -- Security Considerations
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/11
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
John Levine
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
SM
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
ned+ietf-smtp
-
2008/03/10
Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/10
Off-topic: Partly unreadable mail from Martin/Eudora
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/10
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/10
Re: Off-topic: Partly unreadable mail from Martin/Eudora
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/10
Off-topic: Partly unreadable mail from Martin/Eudora
Arnt Gulbrandsen
-
2008/03/09
Re: email-arch I18N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/09
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Stephane Bortzmeyer
-
2008/03/09
email-arch-11-05dc: version for i...@phili, extensive changes
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/09
Re: email-arch I18N
Keld Jørn Simonsen
-
2008/03/09
Re: email-arch I18N
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/09
Re: email-arch I18N
Alessandro Vesely
-
2008/03/08
email-arch I18N (was: email-arch -- Security Considerations)
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/03/08
Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations
Hector Santos
-
2008/03/08
Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
John Levine
-
2008/03/08
email-arch -- Security Considerations
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/08
email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N
Dave Crocker
-
2008/03/02
Re: random rfc2821bis-08 notes
SM
-
2008/02/29
RE: The "such responses" extension sentence (was: Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interpretation of 2821)
Trevor Paquette
-
2008/02/28
Re: random rfc2821bis-08 notes
Mark E. Mallett
-
2008/02/28
Re: rfc2821bis-08
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/02/27
Re: random rfc2821bis-08 notes
Frank Ellermann
-
2008/02/27
random rfc2821bis-08 notes
Mark E. Mallett
-
2008/02/26
Re: Using RSET with the EHLO/HELO fallback logic
Valdis . Kletnieks
-
2008/02/26
Re: rfc2821bis-08
Alexey Melnikov
-
2008/02/26
Re: Using RSET with the EHLO/HELO fallback logic
John C Klensin
-
2008/02/26
Re: Using RSET with the EHLO/HELO fallback logic
Hector Santos
-
2008/02/26
Re: Using RSET with the EHLO/HELO fallback logic
Hector Santos
-
2008/02/26
Re: Using RSET with the EHLO/HELO fallback logic
Hector Santos
-
2008/02/25
Re: Using RSET with the EHLO/HELO fallback logic
John C Klensin