*> well-known, but some RFCs such as those on OSPF may be much *> more vivid if written in XML. There have been quite a few Vivid? We are talking about deeply complex technical documents here, not MTV. What do you mean, "vivid"? Bob Braden
- Re: Why XML is perferable Wang Xianzhu
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jorge Amodio
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jun'an Gao
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jun'an Gao
- Re: Why XML is perferable Valdis . Kletnieks
- Why XML is perferable Wang Xianzhu
- RE: Why XML is perferable graham . travers
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jon Crowcroft
- RE: Why XML is perferable graham . travers
- RE: Why XML is perferable Shaw, Robert
- Re: Why XML is perferable Bob Braden
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jun'an Gao
- Re: Why XML is perferable Sean Finn
- Re: Why XML is perferable Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Why XML is perferable Bob Braden
- Re: Why XML is perferable Stephen McHenry
- Re: Why XML is perferable Jon Crowcroft
- Re: Why XML is perferable John Stracke
- Re: Why XML is perferable Ren
- Re: Why XML is perferable Eliot Lear
- Re: Why XML is perferable Scott Brim