At 12:20 PM 2/24/2001, Bob Braden wrote:
>Surely you jest.  Animated GIF?  How did you get through school without
>having your algebra dance on a screen?  We can color the independent
>variables red, the functions green, and ...

Hey, that's not a bad idea.

>The serious protocol implementors I know construct their own private
>"gif"s on whiteboards and in their heads, and they get by without
>animation.  Sheesh.

<SARCASM>
Hey, real serious protocol implementors don't need no stinkin' animation. 
We don't need no stinkin' pictures. In fact, we don't need no stinking 
English either. Just give us the equations and the state matrix. Anybody 
that can't just understand that? Well, screw 'em!!
</SARCASM>

On a more serious note, having done a lot of instruction over the years, it 
shouldn't be about ego (I paid my "understanding dues" - everyone else 
should too!!), it should be about communication... i.e., how quickly can we 
effectively communicate complex concepts... I have waded my way through 
lots of documents (RFCs and some really incomprehensible stuff too) over 
the years and it isn't (or shouldn't be) about whether or not you have the 
intellectual fortitude to wade through and figure it out, it should be 
about how quickly can you communicate those concepts to others. Why take an 
hour if 45 min will suffice? Why take 6 hours if 1.5 will do? The sooner 
it's clear, the sooner I can begin implementing it. The clearer it is, the 
less likely I am to make any errors of understanding. The quicker I can 
implement a correct version, the sooner I can start on the next thing I 
work on... all of which adds up to the more I can accomplish in a given 
period of time.

It seems to me that what we really need is a truly representation 
independent form of content, both words and pictures (both still and 
moving) that is renderable according to user preferences on any specific 
device, taking into account the limitations of the device. XML isn't 
completely that, but it's closer than ASCII, or html, or other forms. But, 
it's a long way short of what I could personally dream of...

OTOH, you might feel the same way another person did who responded 
(privately) to my previous post with:

         "You totally fail to get it. "

Could be...

Wait! I think I still have an ASR-33 in the basement!! I think I hear it 
calling...


Stephen

Stephen McHenry
VP, Engineering/CTO
Cacheware, Inc.
655 Campbell Technology Pkwy, Suite 150
Campbell, CA 95008
Ph:  (408) 540-1270
Fax: (408) 540-1305
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.cacheware.com

Reply via email to