On 6/11/13 9:52 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > The flip side of that argument is that we don't want to assume working > groups are infallible, or more importantly not subject to the groupthink > phenomenon. Otherwise what is IETF LC for?
Right. We've had some issues with document quality, and I can think of several documents that sailed through WG last call and should not have. Melinda
