On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Rajeev J Sebastian < rajeev.sebast...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:20 PM, nishandh M <pro.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:53 PM, bipin kumar <bipin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> look you are going overboard over decisions that normal in a > >> enterprise/organization. > > > > true.But isnt it like: FSUG is an organisation, and ilug-tvm is its > > imprint. > >> > >> these decisions are result of deliberation > >> within the organization, and outside advisors. further theses > >> decisions are also influenced by the organizational need, its > >> financial condition etc. > > > > The affore said parameters are variables. What if a functionally > structured > > enterprise is born out of FSUG?(not a power hierarchy) Some responders > in > > the list are working admirably on external funds. [and commited > performers > > are already being absorbed by enterprises where ever their policies > match] > > The meaning of your phrase could be read as "FSUG/its like-minded members > > should never form an enterprise". > > HAHAHA. You must be joking. That will never work, because employees > somehow think 100% differently when they come home and don their > "FLOSS" hats. > Assuming you left off the working atmosphere and resource-to-productivity-ratio in a committed NGO? > > > > > Heck = "way of referring to Hell " why does men get this much adrenaline > > rush on my comments? is it that i am some non-techie? (non-touchee > > :) ).Non-techies cant stand for anything in FLOSS? being at CCMB you are > > aware how much tissue you are endangering with the adrenaline rush. > Forget > > that its from me, just consider the logic. > > Tell me out right that "we dont want to hear this from you, you 'krimi', > you > > F***" and i stops it :) not. > > Guess what I am saying right now? :P > yaeh, you made it very straight earlier, i want some more signs under it! > > >> > >> which means that > >> this solution is optimized for their purpose, > > > > Question: A solution is proposed, without proper allocation. The usual > > election propagande way. agree/disagree? is it working? > >> > >> i repeat their purpose. > >> these might include customizing the os specific to hardware/software > >> set to get their job done. for chrissake these systems are meant to do > >> official job and not for ordinary use such as watching movies. playing > >> games. > > > > Bad bad attitude of techies that watching movies and playing games are > > not_for_the_most_adorable_of_them. > > Arent you playing a first person shooter game at the moment? Look you > have > > succesfully gathered an (+100) sabotage package, which you may percieve > as > > MOAB or SWORD! you are adding men to your Holly Alliance to a strategic > > game. The more logical you are, the more support your argument get. > > To state it seriously: The frame work to watch movies, play games are > shared > > for watching news streams and working research/educational simulators. > > We (who ever it is) doesnt use it for creative purpose means we have set > our > > priorities adorably like that. > > Most techies watch a lot of movies and play a lot of games ... (or get > entertained in some other way). I personally have a 600GB collection > of movies and play Urbanterror every 5-6 hours. > @ sorry man, this is personal, its certainly better than my personality which you comentd upon.(the allopathy thingy, which you mis interpreted as modern medicine as such). > > > >> > >> this is how redhat/canonical makes money. they don't sell the os. > >> instead they charge for the customer support/service. i.e tailoring > >> the os to meet the customers need. > > > > Converse of theory: The more stupid the base distribution is, the more > money > > they get. (Reading in between lines). Let their buisiness model work. for > > any sake. > > Fact: IF a FLOSS company with buisiness ethics propose that 'they rectify > > the problems of ITC sector of Govt of Kerala' based on FLOSS, they can > win > > it without even 1% of the money M$ spent on Malyasian bureaucracy*. (*as > > read on internet). > > You are 100% wrong about this. I would say the "Govt" has other > priorities than supporting FLOSS or supporting companies with business > ethics. What they are committed to is of course, using FLOSS as an > election platform or as a promotion platform to fool people. > any Govt(Kerala), not allocating resources for FLOSS development, is doing harm to the nation in long term. > > > Regards > Rajeev J Sebastian > > -- > "Freedom is the only law". > "Freedom Unplugged" > http://www.ilug-tvm.org > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ilug-tvm" group. > To control your subscription visit > http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe > To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > > > For details visit the google group page: > http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en > -- #//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////# "Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" Leonardo da Vinci #//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////# -- "Freedom is the only law". "Freedom Unplugged" http://www.ilug-tvm.org You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ilug-tvm" group. To control your subscription visit http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe To post to this group, send email to ilug-tvm@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ilug-tvm-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For details visit the google group page: http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en
