Swapnil Bhartiya wrote: [snipped the quotes from Greg's blog]
> And this response brings me back to my main point of my talk, which most > people seem to have missed as they were upset at me pointing out Canonical's > lack of upstream contributions. And that point was, and still is: Developers > who are not allowed to contribute to Linux should change jobs!* ^^^ that's the take-away. The whole ruckus about Canonical was something that distracted everyone from this. -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
