On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01 2008, Gaurav Mishra wrote: > > >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> As Manoj has pointed out, there is probably a problem right now, and he >>> might be right about it. My take is that it is not always an >>> intentional thing but more of a case of a problem in managing the a >>> project of the scale of Ubuntu. >>> >> >> Fully agreed , This is a very logical and practical reasoning. However >> blaming Ubuntu is crazy > > So, a project that handles only a fraction of the packages > Debian does (only a couple thousand in the main repo, iirc), 95% of > which it pulls through unchanged from Debian (there does no work on > them), which handles one tenth of the architectures Debian supports, > with corporate backing from a billionaire (which Debian does not have), > they do less well of a job than unpaid Debian volunteers can, and for > that stellar performance, they are suppoosed to be criticism free? >
Compare the number of volunteer contricuters of debian and ubuntu! Compare the time-span of existence of ubuntu and debian ! Your above statement sounds to me like "Telling a startup to close it`s business , Because they are not as big as IBM" Be optimistic and look constructive -- Thanks and Regards Gaurav Mishra Linux User #348873 http://gauravmishra.info/blog "When i can run , i will run , When i can walk , i will walk, When i can crawl , i will crawl. But i will not stop moving forward" _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
