Gaurav Mishra wrote: > GPL doens`t says that when you use some code , Go spoonfeed the > changes back to developers, The code is open all there , And the point > made by canonical not to make it upstream for each project is valid > and practical. No way some company go behind 1000`s bugzilla to track > what`s happening
Hmm...ok, for a moment step back from the 'Canonical doesn't contribute' line and associated blips to view the talk video at the point where Greg whiteboards the way things work. Pause it there. And, then ask yourself - if you were a consumer of a distribution and invest in stuff around it, how would you want your distribution to become a 'good citizen' ? This would be the third time (and possibly the last) that I'd be writing in about ignoring the 'Canonical' lines in Greg's talk and just think about the whiteboard (and perhaps do a quick read through producingoss.com) -- http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work _______________________________________________ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
