I know that this is a flamebait, but ...
"M.S.Yatnatti CEO KPN UNLIMITD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it illegal to redistribute RHEL? if so why?
Please go through the license which comes with RHEL.
> Under what provision of trademark law Redhat claims the
> copyrights and where it has registered the copyrights for
> RHEL. Does it own RHEL..
Certainly, you need to take legal advice. Prevention is better than
cure.
> How redhat is GPL compliant.Fedora is upstream and open gate when
Open gate? What is that?
Fedora is upstream for what? RHEL?
> it flow down stream in the name of RHEL its gate are shut.which is
> derived version of Fedora becomes owned by Redhat under
> trademarks. Your views might be diffrent than others .Please let me
> know your views only .Let us know your logic. M.S.Yatnatti
I think you should do some search on the topic of RHEL and its
redistribution. There are umpteen search engines out there; and it
will take you very little time to find the relevant material.
And there are alternatives to RHEL, if you want to be a sponger and
re-distribute RHEL without a quid pro quo.
--
Mahesh T. Pai
Man's most judicious trait, is a good sense of what not to believe.
--Euripides
_______________________________________________
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
