Start thinking less and less about Exchange .. It's a nightmare compared
to iMail .. We have five dual cpu servers running Exchange 2000 and they
are always having issues where iMail and its solution really has little
happen to it .. Now sendmail is also used within our company and it
never seems to have problems and is quite robust .. Much less in the way
of hardware requirements as well .. But just my humble opion.

Brian R. Watters
Totlcom BroadBand Services.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice Page 877-884-2125 option 2
Wireless EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.totlcom.com
559-297-5000 ext 2612
559-454-7634 fax


 

This message and any attachments are solely for the use of intended
recipients. They may contain privileged and/or confidential information,
attorney work product or other information protected from disclosure. If
you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you
received this email in error, and that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this email and any attachment is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact the
sender and delete the message and any attachment from your system. Thank
you for your cooperation.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Charles Frolick
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [imail] IMail v7.04 "feature?"


That would depend on your needs, for a small office with one or two
domains you'll need the same server power as Imail running an ISP with
over 10,000 mail boxes and couple of hundred domains.  BTW, different
software different problems. I ran an Exchange server that shut down all
services about once every few months to rebuild bad indices, it did it
all on it's own, came right back up after about 10 minutes, but there
were only about 100 coprorate mail boxes with medium traffic loads.  It
also ran about 60% resouces on a PIII Xeon 700 with 256MB RAM.  My Imail
box has 8,000 mailboxes, typical ISP traffic, standard PIII 700, 128MB
RAM, and sits around 5% resources used.  If anyone knows of the bug free
server let us all know, resource hogging is a very expensive bug. Be
sure to weigh all of the pros and cons.

That is of course, just my opinion.

Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
svoto
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [imail] IMail v7.04 "feature?"


I Am thinking more and more about Exchange!!!


Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Webmaster Oilfield Directory
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [imail] IMail v7.04 "feature?"


Funny you should say that... we are getting a similar error, hopefully
someone knows how to "fix it" if it's possible to fix it. We have named
it the rotating error. It seems it will pick (if that's the right word)
an account at random and the user will not be able to access the account
for a day or two and then it will suddenly start working. Anybody else
have that happen. It's very irritating. Any ideas.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
svoto
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [imail] IMail v7.04 "feature?"


Anyone Having problems with IMAIL clients cant connect to Mail server
then they close Outlook and re-open and they are fine?


Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [imail] IMail v7.04 "feature?"



>"Thank you for your email. We would like to inform you that we were 
>replacing the web-interface template and necessary configuration on the

>mail server and it just corrupted the email folders."
>
>Now, I have long past given up getting any sort of technically accurate

>response from these folks, so I thought I would run this situation past

>you IMail gurus on this forum.  Is there a known corruption risk when 
>upgrading, or did they in some way neglect to import the old messages 
>when they upgraded?




______________________________________________________________________
The HKSI-IMail Admin List is hosted by........ Humankind Systems, Inc.
Questions, Comments or Complain like Hell.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Archive... http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.4
To Manage your Subscription......... http://humankindsystems.com/lists




______________________________________________________________________
The HKSI-IMail Admin List is hosted by........ Humankind Systems, Inc.
Questions, Comments or Complain like Hell.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Archive... http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.4
To Manage your Subscription......... http://humankindsystems.com/lists





______________________________________________________________________
The HKSI-IMail Admin List is hosted by........ Humankind Systems, Inc.
Questions, Comments or Complain like Hell.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Archive... http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.4
To Manage your Subscription......... http://humankindsystems.com/lists






______________________________________________________________________
The HKSI-IMail Admin List is hosted by........ Humankind Systems, Inc.
Questions, Comments or Complain like Hell.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Archive... http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.4
To Manage your Subscription......... http://humankindsystems.com/lists

Reply via email to