The problems is that we have about 1000 users and we do not have many of
there passwords documented. So starting from scrath is not real a choice.
Unless you know a way to get all of nt manger's passwords...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cal Frye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 10:44 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Windows 2000
> Just my 2 cents worth--
> We were using the NT (4.0) User database, but switched to the IMail
internal
> db due to hassles changing passwords and the like. AFIK from following
this
> list, every other feature of IMail works with Windows 2000, just not the
NT
> user database. Do you really want to go this road?
>
> --Cal Frye, Western Reserve Academy, Hudson, Ohio
>
> "Change is not made without inconvenience, even from worse to
> better." --Richard Hooker, 1554-1600
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason Smith
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 12:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Windows 2000
>
>
> They stated it would be out within days of Win2K release... So they are
WAY
> behind schedule, and I wouldn't have purchased Imail if they hadn't messed
> up about the release date. Their site stated that it was working when
> obviously it doesn't. Very annoying, and their silence about it is even
> worse. The patch was released then taken back, I have it, but haven't
dared
> to try it.
> Anyone know what the issues are with 6.03? I hear the win2k
> authentication worked but caused other issues. I should just install it
and
> see what happens on a test box. ;o)
> Jason
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
