My understanding is that the "To" field would be NULL then. Maybe I'm wrong.
Jonas Fornander - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netwood Communications - www.netwood.net
Find out why we're better - Tel: 310-442-1530
----- Original Message -----
From: Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Empty "To" field
> The server uses an empty to field to send return receipts and other error
> messages, so killing the blank to field would probably kill that option.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.kendra.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Len Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 2:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Empty "To" field
>
>
> >
> > >Does anyone know if it's possible to write a rule to filter out
messages
> > >that has an empty "To" field. An empty "To" field is not the same as
NULL
> so
> > >enabling "refuse NULL sender" doesn't solve of the problem.
> >
> > Isn't the SMTPD server going to bounce the msg as "unknown user" before
> > filtering gets a chance?
> >
> > Len
> >
> >
> > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> > to be removed from this list.
> >
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
