On 4/15/02, Norman J. Nolasco penned: >He's right. Sorry, forgot to mention that. It's an MS Access thing. He >was being pretty generous too. We had an application built on an Access >database (Access 97) that could pretty much handle about 20 people before >it got too slow to be useful. I'd hate to think what would have happened >if it served 500 people... or even 50! It just can't handle that many >requests that quickly (especially over ODBC). > >We're running on MS SQL2K with about 150 users with no problems... yet.
I'm running Access 2000, 150+ domains and well over 500 users. Nary a problem. >Is there any reason you can't use IMail's Database? It's supposed to be >able to handle thousands of users with no problem. We only have about >50 using the IMail Database. Not to sound hypocritical, but if you don't >have a REALLY good reason to use the External Database, you shouldn't. Just not filling up the registry with all that crap is an excellent reason for me to stay away from it. :) -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ 954.721.3452 Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
