>You claim: "In the years I've been using IMail, I've never heard any reports
>of it using the wrong MX priorities."
>
>How can that be. You've replied to this very problem many times and a few
>THIS MONTH. Here's one of your responses from July 15th:
Sorry -- when I say that I haven't heard any reports of a problem, I mean
that I haven't heard any verifiable reports of a problem.
>"That would suggest that IMail isn't handling the situation
>properly"...
"suggest" is the key word here. Something was explained without enough
information to determine the problem. Since no followup was posted, I
assume the original poster figured out the problem.
>Sounds strange to me that you say you've never heard of this problem when
>you've been aware of it for years.
I still cannot recall a single time when someone has shown that IMail did
not follow the MX record priority (and as I have clearly stated, I do
recall several versions where IMail would go to the A record sometimes when
it should not have, but only after trying the MX records first).
If you can post log file snippets, we will be happy to assist you
further. Note that if you do not, your post will go into the "unsolved --
insufficient information" file, and when asked again, I will again have to
say that I am not aware of any issues with IMail not using the MX records
properly.
-Scott
---
Declude: Anti-virus, Anti-spam and Anti-hijacking solutions for
IMail. http://www.declude.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Please visit the Knowledge Base for answers to frequently asked
questions: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
