Hello Tom, Wednesday, August 6, 2003, 7:47:26 AM, you wrote:
TP> Is it being filtered because of connection filtering? If so, it must be TP> placed in the trusted IPs, as the white list only takes care of content TP> filtering. TP> Tom TP> ----- Original Message ----- TP> From: "Peter Lowish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TP> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TP> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:26 AM TP> Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8 + spam TP> | TP> | A problem with a client having email sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] TP> | TP> | I have that address in the servers white list and it is activated TP> | TP> | How come it is still being deleted? TP> | TP> | Regards TP> | Peter TP> | TP> | TP> | TP> | Our logs found this TP> | TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [192.168.0.100] connect TP> | 63.231.195.113 port 3070 TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] HELO TP> | mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] MAIL TP> | FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] RCPT TP> | TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TP> | 20030805 050121 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] TP> | C:\IMail\spool\D9160006002fa22da.SMD 2147 TP> | 20030805 050121 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) performing antispam TP> checks TP> | TP> | Then it goes to the spam area and our spamlog say this TP> | TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: TP> | connecting to service (spamhaus:*:sbl.spamhaus.org) TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: TP> | 63.231.195.113 was not found on list (spamhaus:*:sbl.spamhaus.org) TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: TP> | connecting to service (fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: TP> | 63.231.195.113 was found on list (fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> message failed TP> | check <fiveten> which was marked as trusted, deleting TP> | TP> | TP> | fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com says this TP> | TP> | IP address 63.231.195.113 is listed here as qwest.net spam-support. Please TP> | note that the following comments apply to qwest.net since 63.231.195.113 TP> | seems to be owned or controlled by them. TP> | TP> | This does NOT mean that we ever received spam from 63.231.195.113. It TP> just TP> | means that the upstream owner of that address block (which seems to be TP> | qwest.net) is listed here for spam support. That upstream needs to resolve TP> | the below issues. TP> | TP> | "added 2002-08-11; spam support - hosting giantrewards/intervolved on TP> | 216.150.221.* and 66.77.33.143" TP> | "added 2002-09-10; spam support - hosting blastdirect.com on TP> | net-63-236-75-0-1" TP> | "added 2002-09-11; spam support - see TP> | spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=qwest.net&-nothing=Search" TP> | "added 2002-12-05; spam support - hosting freedom-technologies.net, see TP> | spews.org/html/S807.html" TP> | "added 2003-06-17; spam support - hosting www2.epcparts.com on TP> 65.119.10.65" TP> | "added 2003-07-20; spam support - hosting kohls.com spammer" TP> | "added 2003-07-30; spam support - see TP> | spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL9622" TP> | TP> | TP> | If some mail server is rejecting your email based on the above listing, TP> ask TP> | them to either whitelist your address or to stop using this list. I don't TP> | know who is using blackholes.five-ten-sg.com to block email - it is my TP> | personal list used to protect my personal mail servers (and my clients). I TP> | make it public so that anyone who has mail rejected here can find out why TP> it TP> | was rejected. TP> | TP> | You might want to search on Google in news.admin.net-abuse.* for TP> qwest.net. TP> | You might consider moving to a provider whose ip packets are more TP> acceptable TP> | to the rest of the internet. TP> | TP> | TP> | To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html TP> | List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ TP> | Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ Has anyone one had any mysterious problems with Imail v.8 blamed on the elusive 'NIC' problem. We're still having some issues with 7.15 that Ipswitch blamed on the NICs (even though we did everything they told us). I haven't seen it mentioned here in a while and didn't know if they secretly took care of this issue in v.8. -- Best regards, David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
