If you have five ten marked as trusted, it will automatically delete messages under connection filtering.
White List is *only* for content filtering, and has no bearing on connection filtering. If you want the mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to bypass connection filtering, the IP range must be placed in the trusted IP address section. Unless I don't understand your question/problem. Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:52 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail NIC issue | Hello Tom, | | Wednesday, August 6, 2003, 7:47:26 AM, you wrote: | | TP> Is it being filtered because of connection filtering? If so, it must be | TP> placed in the trusted IPs, as the white list only takes care of content | TP> filtering. | | TP> Tom | TP> ----- Original Message ----- | TP> From: "Peter Lowish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | TP> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | TP> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:26 AM | TP> Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8 + spam | | | TP> | | TP> | A problem with a client having email sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TP> | | TP> | I have that address in the servers white list and it is activated | TP> | | TP> | How come it is still being deleted? | TP> | | TP> | Regards | TP> | Peter | TP> | | TP> | | TP> | | TP> | Our logs found this | TP> | | TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [192.168.0.100] connect | TP> | 63.231.195.113 port 3070 | TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] HELO | TP> | mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net | TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] MAIL | TP> | FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | TP> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] RCPT | TP> | TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | TP> | 20030805 050121 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] | TP> | C:\IMail\spool\D9160006002fa22da.SMD 2147 | TP> | 20030805 050121 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) performing antispam | TP> checks | TP> | | TP> | Then it goes to the spam area and our spamlog say this | TP> | | TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | TP> | connecting to service (spamhaus:*:sbl.spamhaus.org) | TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | TP> | 63.231.195.113 was not found on list (spamhaus:*:sbl.spamhaus.org) | TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | TP> | connecting to service (fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) | TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | TP> | 63.231.195.113 was found on list (fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) | TP> | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> message failed | TP> | check <fiveten> which was marked as trusted, deleting | TP> | | TP> | | TP> | fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com says this | TP> | | TP> | IP address 63.231.195.113 is listed here as qwest.net spam-support. Please | TP> | note that the following comments apply to qwest.net since 63.231.195.113 | TP> | seems to be owned or controlled by them. | TP> | | TP> | This does NOT mean that we ever received spam from 63.231.195.113. It | TP> just | TP> | means that the upstream owner of that address block (which seems to be | TP> | qwest.net) is listed here for spam support. That upstream needs to resolve | TP> | the below issues. | TP> | | TP> | "added 2002-08-11; spam support - hosting giantrewards/intervolved on | TP> | 216.150.221.* and 66.77.33.143" | TP> | "added 2002-09-10; spam support - hosting blastdirect.com on | TP> | net-63-236-75-0-1" | TP> | "added 2002-09-11; spam support - see | TP> | spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=qwest.net&-nothing=Search" | TP> | "added 2002-12-05; spam support - hosting freedom-technologies.net, see | TP> | spews.org/html/S807.html" | TP> | "added 2003-06-17; spam support - hosting www2.epcparts.com on | TP> 65.119.10.65" | TP> | "added 2003-07-20; spam support - hosting kohls.com spammer" | TP> | "added 2003-07-30; spam support - see | TP> | spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL9622" | TP> | | TP> | | TP> | If some mail server is rejecting your email based on the above listing, | TP> ask | TP> | them to either whitelist your address or to stop using this list. I don't | TP> | know who is using blackholes.five-ten-sg.com to block email - it is my | TP> | personal list used to protect my personal mail servers (and my clients). I | TP> | make it public so that anyone who has mail rejected here can find out why | TP> it | TP> | was rejected. | TP> | | TP> | You might want to search on Google in news.admin.net-abuse.* for | TP> qwest.net. | TP> | You might consider moving to a provider whose ip packets are more | TP> acceptable | TP> | to the rest of the internet. | TP> | | TP> | | TP> | To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html | TP> | List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ | TP> | Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ | Has anyone one had any mysterious problems with Imail v.8 blamed on the elusive 'NIC' | problem. We're still having some issues with 7.15 that Ipswitch | blamed on the NICs (even though we did everything they told us). I | haven't seen it mentioned here in a while and didn't know if they | secretly took care of this issue in v.8. | | | -- | Best regards, | David mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | | To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html | List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ | Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ | To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
