Is it being filtered because of connection filtering? If so, it must be placed in the trusted IPs, as the white list only takes care of content filtering.
Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Lowish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 6:26 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 8 + spam | | A problem with a client having email sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | I have that address in the servers white list and it is activated | | How come it is still being deleted? | | Regards | Peter | | | | Our logs found this | | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [192.168.0.100] connect | 63.231.195.113 port 3070 | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] HELO | mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] MAIL | FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | 20030805 050120 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] RCPT | TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | 20030805 050121 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) [63.231.195.113] | C:\IMail\spool\D9160006002fa22da.SMD 2147 | 20030805 050121 127.0.0.1 SMTPD (006002FA) performing antispam checks | | Then it goes to the spam area and our spamlog say this | | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | connecting to service (spamhaus:*:sbl.spamhaus.org) | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | 63.231.195.113 was not found on list (spamhaus:*:sbl.spamhaus.org) | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | connecting to service (fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> BLACKLIST: | 63.231.195.113 was found on list (fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com) | 08:05 05:01 SMTPD(006002FA) [00002048] <www.ouraddress.com> message failed | check <fiveten> which was marked as trusted, deleting | | | fiveten:*:blackholes.five-ten-sg.com says this | | IP address 63.231.195.113 is listed here as qwest.net spam-support. Please | note that the following comments apply to qwest.net since 63.231.195.113 | seems to be owned or controlled by them. | | This does NOT mean that we ever received spam from 63.231.195.113. It just | means that the upstream owner of that address block (which seems to be | qwest.net) is listed here for spam support. That upstream needs to resolve | the below issues. | | "added 2002-08-11; spam support - hosting giantrewards/intervolved on | 216.150.221.* and 66.77.33.143" | "added 2002-09-10; spam support - hosting blastdirect.com on | net-63-236-75-0-1" | "added 2002-09-11; spam support - see | spamhaus.org/sbl/listings.lasso?isp=qwest.net&-nothing=Search" | "added 2002-12-05; spam support - hosting freedom-technologies.net, see | spews.org/html/S807.html" | "added 2003-06-17; spam support - hosting www2.epcparts.com on 65.119.10.65" | "added 2003-07-20; spam support - hosting kohls.com spammer" | "added 2003-07-30; spam support - see | spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL9622" | | | If some mail server is rejecting your email based on the above listing, ask | them to either whitelist your address or to stop using this list. I don't | know who is using blackholes.five-ten-sg.com to block email - it is my | personal list used to protect my personal mail servers (and my clients). I | make it public so that anyone who has mail rejected here can find out why it | was rejected. | | You might want to search on Google in news.admin.net-abuse.* for qwest.net. | You might consider moving to a provider whose ip packets are more acceptable | to the rest of the internet. | | | To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html | List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ | Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ | To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
