>>Raid0 increases the chances of >>server failure if any drive goes down, the array cannot be rebuilt and you >>must start from scratch or restore from a backup, i.e. increased down >>time. Raid1 has slower right times.
> I've never seen RAID1 writing be slower than RAID5. what's your reference? I stated this wrong. Raid1 has slower writes that Raid0 > Which RAID makes no difference in speed if the disk system isn't > stressed/congested. Exactly. 3 ax 15k rpm drives on a 5 mb connection did not appear to be a bottleneck to me. Todd To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
