Shawn Walker wrote: > Thoughts on using SUNWCrnet + necessary items instead? > > Or is the point to get something simple quickly and hence the use of > SUNWCreq since it is a "known variable"?
I can't speak for engineering, but I think it's good that it's a 'known variable' - it's been tested, and known to work. There may be some additional slimming that could be done for sure, but I'm well out of my territory on that one. Glynn _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
