On 02/07/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I think SUNWCreq may actually be more than we want. Does anybody know
>> how big it and all of its dependencies is?
>
> Compressed, I believe it's about 90MB as of snv_67 (the numbers that
> Glynn posted were I believe the uncompressed sizes of the packages).
>
> Enclosed below is a summary of SUNWCreq - there are some parts which
> could probably be removed (such as the NFS server or FTP packages) but
> initially I would concentrate on what besides SUNWCreq is of interest
> and come back to SUNWCreq if necessary.

I've taken a look at this list, converted the listed clusters into packages, and
got some *compressed* package sizes -

http://www.gnome.org/~gman/creq-package-list-sizes.txt
http://www.gnome.org/~gman/creq-package-list-sizes-ordered.txt

The top packages are the following -

9.4M    SUNWckr                         Core Solaris Kernel (Root)
7.2M    SUNWcsl                         Core Solaris, (Shared Libs)
6.5M    SUNWcslr                        Core Solaris Libraries (Root)
5.4M    SUNWcsu                         Core Solaris, (Usr)
5.3M    SUNWperl584usr                  Perl 5.8.4 (non-core)
4.6M    SUNWmdb                         Modular Debugger

which are all pretty small generally.

FWIW, the top contenders of the 1st Solaris CD (outside SUNWCreq) are -

26M     SUNWj6rt                        JDK 6.0 Runtime Env. (1.6.0_01)
14.4M   SUNWxorg-server                 X.Org Foundation Xserver
13.9M   SUNW5ttf                        Traditional Chinese (BIG5) True Type
                                        Fonts Package
9.1M    NVDAgraphics                    NVIDIA Graphics System Software

with 61.5M for the boot miniroot, and 68M for X server install image.

That looks crazy enough that it just might work! :)

I only hope that all the problems related to Java 6 are sorted out by
the first ISO spin (Studio installer, other crashes, etc.)...

--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. " --Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to