Moinak Ghosh wrote: > Glynn Foster wrote: > > Doug Scott wrote: > > > >> Back to the Java front. I think that it would be a mistake not to > >> include the jre in the base, though the jre size on Solaris does concern > >> me. > >> > >> Doug > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> du -hs /usr/jdk/jdk1.6.0/jre > >> 124M /usr/jdk/jdk1.6.0/jre > >> > > > > That's certainly a large compromise if we did want to include it. > > Jre on my machine Nevada Build60 is 119M. After a tar + gzip it reduces > down to 41M. Thus it should be okay if we are compressing things.
AFAIK the JRE has a couple of TrueType fonts (e.g. /usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/fonts/*.ttf) which could be soft-linked to the matching X11 fonts on demand (assuming the fonts are identical). ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
